was null Abarth

A Sweet little " Bomb", with its modest engine delivering only 41 HP, 747 Cm3, BUT only 570 Kilos! The interior too is quite modest. Best, Nicolas

turbo engines are robust enough to handle, but only 1.4L? Very close to the same weight as the MX-5 but even in Abarth trim it's down 17 hp compared to Mazda's naturally aspirated 2L engine. This would have been a fantastic sports car with a boosted 1.6 o

A small 1, 4 4 Cylinders engine, but delivering 168 HP. Funny, lovely, not hyper powerful but enough to have some pleasure. Now, with such a name, I would have expected 40 more HP. Best, Nicolas

Even the old abarth 500 has been replaced by an electric model, sigh. A shame that there is no platform available for an alfa/abarth spider model, we don't need a boxster competitor just a good looking soft top, not too heavy and fun to drive apparently i

custom ECU, light weight flywheel, Quaiffe LSD, Coilovers plus the usual recaro seat, forged wheels/brake lines/pads, etc... I was about to upgrade the turbo to a high-flow model by the time I sold it. Abarth 500 are very popular here but there's a decent

The Abarth

www.classic-trader.com

Beside manual transmission I had a set of unusual requirements due to parking space limitations, no more than 190cm wide which ruled out some nice cars (z06, r8 v10). 911s were ruled out early because I already owned one, driven many and they have become

But the range is simply ridiculous. I guess with this R5 you will be able to drive at least 300 km, which means I will be able to do quite more ;-) .... and on some occasions considerably less